Operational intelligence for support teams

Predict SLA breaches before they happen.

BreachIntel helps Zendesk and Freshdesk support teams predict SLA risk, prioritise revenue-at-risk tickets, and automatically turn recurring support problems into reusable knowledge.

Built for mid-market teams of roughly 5–50 agents · Flat per-team pricing

breachintel / sla-risk-console
Sample data

Open tickets

212

At breach risk

27

Revenue at risk

£38,140

Clusters found

9

SLA risk queue

sorted by revenue at risk
  • Payment verification failing

    ZD-48213Cluster #12 · 7 ticketsFrustrated

    at risk

    £4,820

    Critical
    87%
  • Login issue — EU customers

    ZD-48197Cluster #04 · 4 ticketsTense

    at risk

    £1,920

    High
    64%
  • Webhook retries timing out

    FD-11902New pattern · 2 ticketsNeutral

    at risk

    £860

    Medium
    41%
  • Invoice export formatting

    FD-11875Calm

    at risk

    £240

    Low
    18%

Revenue at risk · last 7 days

Sentiment trend

Breach alert

4 tickets projected to breach within 90 minutes. £7,410 revenue exposure.

delivery: dashboard · slack · email

Recurring issue cluster

Payment verification failures

7 tickets · 3 breaches · confirmed pattern

gateway timeout3DS retryEU cards

Knowledge approval queue

Draft: “Payment verification failures”

Internal known-issue + customer article · PII redacted · awaiting manager review

ApproveEdit

Staffing vs breaches by shift

  • 00–08cover 42% · breach 68%
  • 08–16cover 88% · breach 21%
  • 16–24cover 61% · breach 44%

Illustrative interface with sample figures only.

The problem

Two operational gaps that quietly cost support teams

SLA breaches are discovered too late

Traditional support analytics are retrospective. Managers often learn a ticket breached after the deadline has already passed. BreachIntel continuously evaluates open tickets, predicts which are likely to breach, and orders them by revenue at risk so intervention happens early.

Support knowledge stays buried in tickets

The same problems get solved repeatedly while the resolution stays locked inside ticket history. BreachIntel detects recurring patterns and drafts both an internal known-issue record and a customer-facing article — reviewed by a human before publication.

“Don’t just resolve today’s ticket. Learn from it so tomorrow’s ticket can be resolved faster.”

About

Built by people who ran SLA-driven support desks

BreachIntel began with a repeated operational observation: SLA breaches were found after the fact, and hard-won fixes disappeared into ticket history. The platform was designed to close both gaps for teams without dedicated engineering or knowledge-management resources.

SLA pressure and missed breaches
Recurring issues resurfacing week after week
Incident management and root-cause analysis
Customer escalation handling
Helpdesk operations under tight resourcing
Support knowledge lost inside ticket histories
SP

Sandip B. Parekh

Founder & Director

Support operations + domain expertise

  • 11+ years in technical support operations
  • Former Head of Technical Support at Klevu, a UK-headquartered division of Athos Commerce
  • Support team leadership, SLA performance, incident management, root-cause analysis and escalation handling
  • Owns domain knowledge, product requirements, prioritisation and operational validation
DP

Dhruv Patel

CTO

AI/ML + technical product development

  • Applied AI/ML and technical product-development expertise
  • Experience across machine learning, AI, computer vision and generative AI
  • Owns technical architecture and AI/ML implementation

Domain expertise + AI/ML engineering

Platform

An operational-intelligence layer for Zendesk and Freshdesk

BreachIntel is not a chatbot or a generic AI assistant. It sits alongside your existing helpdesk and turns ticket activity into breach forecasts, prioritised risk and reusable knowledge.

Breach Forecasting

Open tickets are continuously scored for SLA breach probability, giving managers an early-warning window. Tickets can be prioritised by revenue at risk so the most commercially important cases surface first.

Know which tickets are most likely to breach before they actually do.

Payment verification failing87%
Login issue — EU customers64%

Recurring-Issue Clustering

Historical and active tickets are analysed to identify recurring problems and probable root causes. Similar tickets are grouped so patterns become visible while they are still small.

Spot recurring problems before they become support spikes.

Cluster #12 · 7Cluster #04 · 4Cluster #09 · 3New · 2

Sentiment & Escalation Radar

Conversation tone and sentiment are analysed across support threads to highlight escalation risk, helping managers identify which conversations may need intervention.

Detect escalation risk before frustration becomes a formal complaint.

Knowledge Automation

When a recurring breach pattern is confirmed across three or more tickets, BreachIntel drafts an internal known-issue record and a customer-facing article. Drafting is triggered by the detected pattern, and every draft enters an approval workflow.

Turn recurring support problems into reusable knowledge automatically.

pattern confirmed → PII redacted → dual draft → approval queue

Structural PII Redaction

Personally identifiable information is structurally removed before ticket content reaches the AI processing layer. This is an architectural control in the pipeline rather than an optional setting.

Protect sensitive customer information before AI processing.

customer: [redacted] · card: [redacted]

Staffing & Shift Correlation

SLA performance is correlated with staffing and shift coverage so support leaders can see whether coverage gaps are contributing to breaches.

Understand how staffing and shift coverage affect SLA performance.

breachintel / sla-risk-console
Sample data

Open tickets

212

At breach risk

27

Revenue at risk

£38,140

Clusters found

9

SLA risk queue

sorted by revenue at risk
  • Payment verification failing

    ZD-48213Cluster #12 · 7 ticketsFrustrated

    at risk

    £4,820

    Critical
    87%
  • Login issue — EU customers

    ZD-48197Cluster #04 · 4 ticketsTense

    at risk

    £1,920

    High
    64%
  • Webhook retries timing out

    FD-11902New pattern · 2 ticketsNeutral

    at risk

    £860

    Medium
    41%
  • Invoice export formatting

    FD-11875Calm

    at risk

    £240

    Low
    18%

Revenue at risk · last 7 days

Sentiment trend

Breach alert

4 tickets projected to breach within 90 minutes. £7,410 revenue exposure.

delivery: dashboard · slack · email

Recurring issue cluster

Payment verification failures

7 tickets · 3 breaches · confirmed pattern

gateway timeout3DS retryEU cards

Knowledge approval queue

Draft: “Payment verification failures”

Internal known-issue + customer article · PII redacted · awaiting manager review

ApproveEdit

Staffing vs breaches by shift

  • 00–08cover 42% · breach 68%
  • 08–16cover 88% · breach 21%
  • 16–24cover 61% · breach 44%

Illustrative interface with sample figures only.

Technology

Built for modern support operations

A four-layer architecture that connects to existing helpdesks, analyses activity, and delivers intelligence where support teams already work.

01

Data source & integration

  • Zendesk API
  • Freshdesk API
  • Slack
  • Email
02

Ingestion & synchronisation

  • OAuth 2.0
  • Webhooks
  • Incremental polling
03

Intelligence engines

  • Breach prediction
  • Recurring-issue clustering
  • Sentiment & escalation analysis
04

Knowledge automation & delivery

  • PII redaction
  • Dual article generation
  • Approval queue
  • Alerting

Product roadmap

Staged rollout. Planned and roadmap capabilities are not presented as current functionality.

MVP / early product

Current focus
  • Breach Forecasting
  • Alerting & delivery
  • Zendesk/Freshdesk integration
  • Revenue-weighted dashboard
  • Slack/email alerts

Post-MVP

Planned
  • Recurring-Issue Clustering
  • Knowledge Automation

Later development

Roadmap
  • Sentiment & Escalation Radar
  • Staffing & Shift Correlation

Longer-term exploration includes additional helpdesk integrations, workforce forecasting, multilingual knowledge generation and anonymised cross-customer benchmarking.

How it works

Connect → Analyse → Predict → Prioritise → Act → Learn

A continuous loop. Every resolved issue makes the next one faster to handle.

  1. 01

    Connect

    Connect BreachIntel to your existing Zendesk or Freshdesk environment. Designed around OAuth-based installation, with no major data migration.

  2. 02

    Sync

    Relevant support-ticket and SLA information is synchronised into the platform.

  3. 03

    Analyse

    Intelligence engines continuously evaluate breach probability, revenue at risk, recurring issues, sentiment, escalation risk and staffing relationships.

  4. 04

    Prioritise

    Tickets and issues that need attention are surfaced, ordered by likelihood of breach and commercial risk.

  5. 05

    Alert

    Insights are delivered through the BreachIntel dashboard, a helpdesk sidebar widget, Slack and email.

  6. 06

    Capture knowledge

    Confirmed recurring issues become internal known-issue records and customer-facing articles, with PII removed before AI processing.

  7. 07

    Approve

    A support manager reviews and approves generated knowledge before anything is published.

  8. 08

    Continuous improvement

    The organisation keeps learning from its ticket history and recurring issues — the loop restarts at Connect.

Market pricing

Simple pricing. No per-agent penalty.

BreachIntel uses predictable flat team-based pricing.

Basic

£149/team/month

Flat per-team pricing. The price does not change with the number of agents in the team.

One team. One predictable price.

Professional

£299/team/month

Flat per-team pricing. The price does not change with the number of agents in the team.

One team. One predictable price.

Enterprise

£599/team/month

Flat per-team pricing. The price does not change with the number of agents in the team.

One team. One predictable price.

Pricing is per team, regardless of agent headcount.

Enterprise-grade intelligence without per-agent pricing

Indicative business-plan benchmark for a 20-agent team.

BreachIntel£149/month
Klaus (per-agent pricing)approx. £400–£600/month

The business plan estimates approximately 63% savings versus a comparable Klaus setup for this example team size, while also adding breach forecasting and automated knowledge capture. This is an indicative comparison, not a universal guarantee.

Implementation & services

Separately from subscription pricing, the business model includes an implementation service at £3,000 per customer, alongside professional services and add-ons. This is not part of the subscription plans above.

Request a pilot

Start a BreachIntel pilot with your team

Share a few details and we will follow up with pilot scoping for your support organisation.

0 requests stored locally in this browser · no backend involved

FAQ

Questions about BreachIntel